World Watch/Jordan/Artificial Intelligence

Artificial Intelligence · Jordan

AI regulation in Jordan (2026)

Guidelines onlyJordanian AI Strategy and Implementation Plan 2023–2027 (MoDEE) + National AI Code of Ethics 2022; no binding AI-specific law in forceCountry index 74 · B+

Jordan shaded by its artificial intelligence status

Jordan governs AI through non-binding strategic documents and an ethics code rather than dedicated legislation. The Ministry of Digital Economy and Entrepreneurship (MoDEE) leads AI policy via the AI Policy 2020, the National AI Code of Ethics (Council of Ministers, August 2022), and the AI Strategy 2023–2027 covering 68 projects across five pillars. Related binding laws — the Personal Data Protection Law No. 24 (2023, effective March 2024) and Cybercrimes Law 2023 — apply to AI use cases involving data and cyber offences, but no comprehensive or AI-specific statute has been enacted.

Key points

AI Strategy 2023–2027

Launched by MoDEE, the strategy sets a five-year roadmap of 68 projects across capacity-building, R&D, investment, legislative support, and public-sector AI adoption, aiming to position Jordan as a regional AI hub.

National AI Code of Ethics

Approved by the Council of Ministers on 3 August 2022, this voluntary framework sets principles of transparency, fairness, privacy, and accountability for AI development and deployment. It was developed by MoDEE with public, private, academic, and civil-society stakeholders.

AI Policy 2020

Jordan's first AI governance document, published by MoDEE, established strategic priorities for integrating AI across public and private sectors and provided a baseline for subsequent strategy iterations.

Personal Data Protection Law No. 24 of 2023

Jordan's first comprehensive data protection law (effective 17 March 2024) governs consent, data subject rights (including right to object to profiling), and cross-border transfers — providing the primary binding framework applicable to AI systems that process personal data.

Cybercrimes Law 2023

Criminalises data interception, unauthorised network access, fake accounts, phishing, and dissemination of misinformation — covering AI-enabled cyber offences without being an AI-specific statute.

Identified regulatory gaps

Academic and legal analysis confirms the absence of a dedicated AI law, weak regulation of algorithmic liability and transparency, and no specialised AI regulatory body. MoDEE's AI Strategy 2023–2027 explicitly lists 'supporting legislative and regulatory environment' as one of five strategic pillars, signalling awareness of the gap.

Jordan - other topics

Last verified 5/24/2026 · Orientation, not legal advice - verify against the primary sources linked above. Explore the full world map →