Why does my cross-chain intent depend on two solvers not going offline?
機会
ERC-7683 standardized cross-chain intents in 2024, promising competitive execution where users broadcast what they want and solvers compete to fill it. Running a production solver requires deep cross-chain inventory, latency-optimized routing, and capital to absorb failed fills, which means only well-funded teams bother. Analysis of 3.5 million intents moved between June and November 2025 shows heavy concentration: a handful of solvers handle most volume and entry barriers have not fallen. When the top solvers exit or go offline, unfilled intents expire and users must retry manually or stay stuck. No mechanism today enforces solver diversity or triggers a guaranteed on-chain fallback.
重要な理由
Intent settlement is concentrating on a handful of solvers the same way bridging concentrated on a handful of relayers, and the failure mode will be identical.
機会をどう評価するか
Opportunity Scoreは測定値ではなく、私自身の見解です。どれほど痛みを伴うか、どれほど頻繁に影響を与えるか、そして今日時点で解決策がいかに少ないか。スコアが高いほど、構築する価値が高いと私は考えています。
それが現れたときにどれほどの痛みをもたらすか。
実際にどれほど頻繁に人々がそれに直面するか。
今日時点で、それに対する優れたツールがいかに少ないか。