Internet & Online Safety · Bolivia
Online safety & content laws in Bolivia (2026)
Bolivia shaded by its internet & online safety status
Online safety rules in Bolivia: partial, under Ley General de Telecomunicaciones, Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (Law No. 164, 2011); Autoridad de Regulación y Fiscalización de Telecomunicaciones y Transportes (ATT); Agencia de Gobierno Electrónico y Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (AGETIC).
Bolivia lacks any dedicated online safety, content-moderation, or platform-liability legislation. The primary digital governance instrument remains the 2011 Telecommunications and ICT Law (No. 164), which covers service licensing and basic ICT development but imposes no obligations on online platforms regarding content moderation, age verification, or harm prevention. A draft personal data protection law has been under congressional analysis since 2023 but has not been enacted.
Key points
Bolivia has enacted no law establishing intermediary liability rules or requiring online platforms to moderate, remove, or report harmful content. Platforms face no obligation to remove content absent a court order, and there is no equivalent of the EU DSA, UK OSA, or Brazil's Marco Civil framework.
Ley No. 164 (8 August 2011) establishes the general telecommunications and ICT licensing regime, created AGETIC for e-government coordination, and provides the constitutional basis for digital governance. It does not address online content safety, platform obligations, or user-protection rules beyond basic service provision.
Bolivian law imposes no obligation on online platforms to verify user age before granting access to services, nor to obtain parental consent for minors. There is no law requiring removal of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) upon notification by any entity.
Bolivia has no comprehensive data protection statute. A draft Data Protection Law has been under analysis in Congress since 2023, grounded partly in constitutional privacy guarantees and building on the ICT provisions of Law No. 164 and Supreme Decree No. 1793 (2013), but it had not been enacted as of early 2026.
The Bolivian constitution guarantees freedom of speech and the government does not impose technical blocking of websites or social media platforms. However, Freedom House and RSF document ongoing threats, harassment, and self-censorship driven by government and pro-government pressure on journalists and online commentators.
Supreme Decree No. 5468 approved AGETIC's Electronic Government Implementation Plan 2025-2028, which includes cybersecurity and incident-management pillars. This is an administrative/e-government instrument and does not create binding obligations on private online platforms or establish an online safety regime.
Timeline - major decisions & events
Bolivia promulgated Law 1636, adding five new offences to the Penal Code, grooming, digital sexual harassment, indecent contact, production of child sexual abuse material, and its distribution/sale online, with sentences of 10-15 years. It is Bolivia's most comprehensive child online-safety legislation to date.
LexiVox – Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia ↗Bolivia's Senate passed bill CS No. 206/2024-2025, adding 'digital violence against women' as a standalone criminal offence with 1-3 years imprisonment for non-consensual sharing of sexual content via any digital platform, amending Law 348. The bill then moved to the Chamber of Deputies for final approval.
Cámara de Senadores de Bolivia ↗MAS Deputy Juan José Huanca introduced Bill PL-304 proposing 5-7 year prison sentences for 'misuse' of social networks, including spreading false information or defaming public officials online. After civil-society outcry over press freedom and evidence of plagiarised text, the bill was withdrawn in April 2023.
Cámara de Diputados de Bolivia ↗After the UN Human Rights Office and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) called for repeal, the Áñez government issued DS 4236, striking down the speech-criminalising provisions of DS 4231. The episode set a precedent that broad executive anti-disinformation decrees face international legal scrutiny.
Viceministerio de Comunicación de Bolivia ↗Interim President Jeanine Áñez enacted DS 4231, making it a criminal offence (1-10 years) to disseminate information in any medium, including online, deemed to 'generate uncertainty or endanger public health.' Human Rights Watch, CPJ, and the IACHR condemned it as a tool to suppress digital criticism of the government.
Committee to Protect Journalists ↗Following the MAS ruling party's defeat in the February 2016 constitutional referendum, attributed partly to anonymous social media campaigns, a bill was formally presented in the Asamblea Legislativa to ban online anonymity, criminalise defamation of officials on social networks, and create a government office to monitor platforms. The bill failed to advance but established a recurring legislative pattern over the following years.
Los Tiempos ↗DS 1793 operationalised the ICT development mandate of Law 164, setting the regulatory basis for e-government, digital signatures, electronic documents, and free-software adoption. It established legal validity for online transactions and digital identity, underpinning Bolivia's early e-commerce and digital-services framework.
LexiVox – Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia ↗Bolivia enacted Law 348, creating broad legal protections against all forms of violence targeting women. Although originally focused on physical and psychological violence, Law 348 became the primary legal anchor for subsequent digital-violence provisions, with later bills explicitly amending it to cover online harassment, image-based abuse, and cyberstalking.
CEPAL/ECLAC Gender Observatory ↗DS 1391 issued the operational framework for the ATT's oversight of telecommunications and internet services, covering spectrum licensing, consumer rights, broadband infrastructure, and service-quality obligations. It remains the primary secondary legislation governing internet service provision in Bolivia.
LexiVox – Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia ↗Law 164 declared communication a fundamental human right, established the Authority for Regulation and Supervision of Telecommunications and Transport (ATT) as the sectoral regulator, and laid the legal framework for internet access, e-commerce, digital signatures, and e-government. It remains the cornerstone of Bolivia's ICT regulatory architecture.
Ministerio de Educación de Bolivia ↗Law 1768 inserted Chapter XI 'Computer Crimes' into the Bolivian Penal Code, creating Article 363 bis (computer manipulation for financial gain, 1-5 years) and Article 363 ter (unauthorised access or alteration of computer data). Enacted before widespread internet use, these two articles remain Bolivia's only specific cybercrime provisions in the Penal Code and are widely criticised as inadequate against modern threats such as ransomware, phishing, and DDoS attacks.
UNODC Cybercrime Legislation Database ↗Bolivia - other topics
Internet & Online Safety in other countries
Last verified 5/24/2026 · Orientation, not legal advice - verify against the primary sources linked above. Methodology & how to cite · Explore the full world map →