Skip to content
World Watch/Bolivia/Internet & Online Safety

Internet & Online Safety · Bolivia

Online safety & content laws in Bolivia (2026)

PartialLey General de Telecomunicaciones, Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (Law No. 164, 2011); Autoridad de Regulación y Fiscalización de Telecomunicaciones y Transportes (ATT); Agencia de Gobierno Electrónico y Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (AGETIC)Country index 61 · C+

Bolivia shaded by its internet & online safety status

Online safety rules in Bolivia: partial, under Ley General de Telecomunicaciones, Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (Law No. 164, 2011); Autoridad de Regulación y Fiscalización de Telecomunicaciones y Transportes (ATT); Agencia de Gobierno Electrónico y Tecnologías de Información y Comunicación (AGETIC).

Bolivia lacks any dedicated online safety, content-moderation, or platform-liability legislation. The primary digital governance instrument remains the 2011 Telecommunications and ICT Law (No. 164), which covers service licensing and basic ICT development but imposes no obligations on online platforms regarding content moderation, age verification, or harm prevention. A draft personal data protection law has been under congressional analysis since 2023 but has not been enacted.

Key points

No platform-liability or content-moderation law

Bolivia has enacted no law establishing intermediary liability rules or requiring online platforms to moderate, remove, or report harmful content. Platforms face no obligation to remove content absent a court order, and there is no equivalent of the EU DSA, UK OSA, or Brazil's Marco Civil framework.

Law No. 164, primary ICT framework (2011)

Ley No. 164 (8 August 2011) establishes the general telecommunications and ICT licensing regime, created AGETIC for e-government coordination, and provides the constitutional basis for digital governance. It does not address online content safety, platform obligations, or user-protection rules beyond basic service provision.

No age-verification requirements

Bolivian law imposes no obligation on online platforms to verify user age before granting access to services, nor to obtain parental consent for minors. There is no law requiring removal of child sexual abuse material (CSAM) upon notification by any entity.

Data protection law proposed but not enacted

Bolivia has no comprehensive data protection statute. A draft Data Protection Law has been under analysis in Congress since 2023, grounded partly in constitutional privacy guarantees and building on the ICT provisions of Law No. 164 and Supreme Decree No. 1793 (2013), but it had not been enacted as of early 2026.

Internet access formally open; press-freedom concerns

The Bolivian constitution guarantees freedom of speech and the government does not impose technical blocking of websites or social media platforms. However, Freedom House and RSF document ongoing threats, harassment, and self-censorship driven by government and pro-government pressure on journalists and online commentators.

AGETIC e-government plan 2025-2028

Supreme Decree No. 5468 approved AGETIC's Electronic Government Implementation Plan 2025-2028, which includes cybersecurity and incident-management pillars. This is an administrative/e-government instrument and does not create binding obligations on private online platforms or establish an online safety regime.

Timeline - major decisions & events

Sep 10, 2025lawofficial
Law 1636: Child Protection in Digital Environments Enacted

Bolivia promulgated Law 1636, adding five new offences to the Penal Code, grooming, digital sexual harassment, indecent contact, production of child sexual abuse material, and its distribution/sale online, with sentences of 10-15 years. It is Bolivia's most comprehensive child online-safety legislation to date.

LexiVox – Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia
Apr 1, 2025lawofficial
Senate Unanimously Approves Digital Violence Against Women Bill

Bolivia's Senate passed bill CS No. 206/2024-2025, adding 'digital violence against women' as a standalone criminal offence with 1-3 years imprisonment for non-consensual sharing of sexual content via any digital platform, amending Law 348. The bill then moved to the Chamber of Deputies for final approval.

Cámara de Senadores de Bolivia
Mar 1, 2023decisionofficial
Bill PL-304/2022-2023: Social Media Criminalisation Proposed and Withdrawn

MAS Deputy Juan José Huanca introduced Bill PL-304 proposing 5-7 year prison sentences for 'misuse' of social networks, including spreading false information or defaming public officials online. After civil-society outcry over press freedom and evidence of plagiarised text, the bill was withdrawn in April 2023.

Cámara de Diputados de Bolivia
May 14, 2020decisionofficial
Supreme Decree 4236: Anti-Disinformation Penal Clauses Revoked

After the UN Human Rights Office and the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights (IACHR) called for repeal, the Áñez government issued DS 4236, striking down the speech-criminalising provisions of DS 4231. The episode set a precedent that broad executive anti-disinformation decrees face international legal scrutiny.

Viceministerio de Comunicación de Bolivia
May 7, 2020law
Supreme Decree 4231: Online COVID-19 'Disinformation' Criminalised

Interim President Jeanine Áñez enacted DS 4231, making it a criminal offence (1-10 years) to disseminate information in any medium, including online, deemed to 'generate uncertainty or endanger public health.' Human Rights Watch, CPJ, and the IACHR condemned it as a tool to suppress digital criticism of the government.

Committee to Protect Journalists
May 17, 2016decision
First Social Media Regulation Bill Introduced, Banning Anonymity Online

Following the MAS ruling party's defeat in the February 2016 constitutional referendum, attributed partly to anonymous social media campaigns, a bill was formally presented in the Asamblea Legislativa to ban online anonymity, criminalise defamation of officials on social networks, and create a government office to monitor platforms. The bill failed to advance but established a recurring legislative pattern over the following years.

Los Tiempos
Nov 13, 2013lawofficial
Supreme Decree 1793: ICT Development Regulation Under Law 164

DS 1793 operationalised the ICT development mandate of Law 164, setting the regulatory basis for e-government, digital signatures, electronic documents, and free-software adoption. It established legal validity for online transactions and digital identity, underpinning Bolivia's early e-commerce and digital-services framework.

LexiVox – Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia
Mar 9, 2013lawofficial
Law 348: Comprehensive Law Guaranteeing Women a Violence-Free Life

Bolivia enacted Law 348, creating broad legal protections against all forms of violence targeting women. Although originally focused on physical and psychological violence, Law 348 became the primary legal anchor for subsequent digital-violence provisions, with later bills explicitly amending it to cover online harassment, image-based abuse, and cyberstalking.

CEPAL/ECLAC Gender Observatory
Oct 24, 2012lawofficial
Supreme Decree 1391: General Implementing Regulation for Law 164

DS 1391 issued the operational framework for the ATT's oversight of telecommunications and internet services, covering spectrum licensing, consumer rights, broadband infrastructure, and service-quality obligations. It remains the primary secondary legislation governing internet service provision in Bolivia.

LexiVox – Gaceta Oficial de Bolivia
Aug 8, 2011lawofficial
Law 164: General Telecommunications and ICT Law, Bolivia's Foundational Internet Framework

Law 164 declared communication a fundamental human right, established the Authority for Regulation and Supervision of Telecommunications and Transport (ATT) as the sectoral regulator, and laid the legal framework for internet access, e-commerce, digital signatures, and e-government. It remains the cornerstone of Bolivia's ICT regulatory architecture.

Ministerio de Educación de Bolivia
Jan 1, 1997lawofficial
Law 1768: Penal Code Amended, First Cybercrime Provisions (Art. 363 bis & ter)

Law 1768 inserted Chapter XI 'Computer Crimes' into the Bolivian Penal Code, creating Article 363 bis (computer manipulation for financial gain, 1-5 years) and Article 363 ter (unauthorised access or alteration of computer data). Enacted before widespread internet use, these two articles remain Bolivia's only specific cybercrime provisions in the Penal Code and are widely criticised as inadequate against modern threats such as ransomware, phishing, and DDoS attacks.

UNODC Cybercrime Legislation Database

Bolivia - other topics

Internet & Online Safety in other countries

Last verified 5/24/2026 · Orientation, not legal advice - verify against the primary sources linked above. Methodology & how to cite · Explore the full world map →