Artificial Intelligence · Philippines
Artificial Intelligence - Philippines
The Philippines governs AI primarily through a non-binding national strategy: President Marcos approved the National AI Strategy for the Philippines (NAIS-PH) on 20 May 2025, setting a whole-of-government roadmap to 2028 across infrastructure, workforce, innovation, data governance/policy, and deployment. There is no comprehensive binding AI statute yet; several 'AI Act'-style bills (e.g. Senate Bill 25 'AIRA' and House proposals for an AI development authority and an AI Bill of Rights) remain pending. Binding rules exist only in narrow sectors, most notably COMELEC's regulation of AI in election campaigns.
President Marcos approved the National AI Strategy for the Philippines (NAIS-PH) at a Malacañang sectoral meeting on 20 May 2025, directing best use of AI for national development with a roadmap targeting an 'AI-powered' Philippines by 2028.
DOST developed NAIS-PH (with DTI sector roadmaps) following the President's March 2025 directive; the strategy is structured around infrastructure, workforce, innovation, data governance and policy, and AI deployment, and is non-binding guidance rather than enforceable law.
Multiple comprehensive bills are pending in Congress, including Senate Bill No. 25, the 'Artificial Intelligence Regulation Act (AIRA),' filed in the 20th Congress (first reading July 2025), plus House proposals to create an AI development/regulatory authority and an 'AI Bill of Rights.' None are enacted.
COMELEC Resolution No. 11064 (adopted 17 Sept 2024, effective 26 Sept 2024) regulates AI and social media in the 2025 national, local and BARMM campaigns: it mandates clear, conspicuous labels/watermarks and disclaimers on AI-generated/manipulated content and prohibits deepfakes, bots and coordinated inauthentic behavior.
Numerous standalone deepfake bills have been filed in both chambers of the 20th Congress (e.g. multiple House Bills and Senate Bills targeting malicious synthetic media), but these remain proposals and are not yet law.
In the absence of an AI-specific statute, AI is governed indirectly through existing instruments such as the Data Privacy Act of 2012 (administered by the National Privacy Commission) and consumer/IP/cybercrime laws, supplemented by agency guidelines in areas like education and e-governance.
Machine-assisted translation · verified 5/23/2026 · orientation, not legal advice. English version →