Why can I only learn which coordination failure hit my agent pipeline after it already did?
κΈ°ν
The MAST taxonomy, validated on over 1,600 production agent execution traces at NeurIPS 2025, names 14 coordination failure modes that account for 79% of multi-agent system failures. Knowing the taxonomy after a failure is useful. Knowing which failure mode a specific architecture will hit before deployment does not yet exist as a tool or discipline. Current evaluation practice runs component-level tests on individual agents but has no method to characterize the emergent failure profile of the whole system under realistic coordination load. Practitioners face a consistent 37% gap between lab performance and production reliability with no diagnostic that predicts where it will open.
μ μ€μνκ°
Predictive coordination failure profiling is what turns a post-mortem taxonomy into a pre-deployment design check, which is the actual lever for cutting the production gap.
κΈ°ν νκ° λ°©μ
κΈ°ν μ μλ μΈ‘μ κ°μ΄ μλ μ μ£Όκ΄μ νκ°μ λλ€. μΌλ§λ λΆνΈνμ§, μΌλ§λ μμ£Ό λ°μνλμ§, νμ¬ ν΄κ²°μ± μ΄ μΌλ§λ λΆμ‘±νμ§λ₯Ό λ°μν©λλ€. μ μκ° λμμλ‘ λ§λ€ κ°μΉκ° λ λλ€κ³ μκ°ν©λλ€.
λ°μνμ λ μΌλ§λ ν° λΆνΈμ μ΄λνλμ§.
μ€μ λ‘ μΌλ§λ μμ£Ό μ νκ² λλμ§.
νμ¬ μ΄λ₯Ό ν΄κ²°ν λ§ν λκ΅¬κ° μΌλ§λ λΆμ‘±νμ§.
ν΄κ²°ν κ°μΉ μλ λ λ§μ λ¬Έμ λ€
νμ λ«λ μκ° λͺ¨λ AI μ±μ΄ λλ₯Ό μμ΄λ²λ¦¬λ μ΄μ λ 무μμΌκΉ?
AIμλ‘μ΄ λΆμΌλ₯Ό λ°°μ°λ κ²μ΄ μ¬μ ν 무μμ λ¬Όμ΄μΌ ν μ§ μλ κ²μ μν΄ μ νλ°λ μ΄μ λ 무μμΌκΉ?
AIλΉμ λ¬Έκ°λ μ AIκ° λ§ν λ΄μ©μ κ²μ¦ν μ μμκΉ?
AIλͺ¨λΈμ λ²€μΉλ§ν¬λ‘ ν μ€νΈνκ³ κ°μΌλ‘ λ°°ν¬νλ μ΄μ λ 무μμΌκΉ?
AIAI μμ΄μ νΈλ μ μμ μ μ€μλ₯Ό κΈ°μ΅νμ§ λͺ»ν κΉμ?
AIλͺ¨λΈμ΄ μ€μ λ‘ λ¬΄μμΌλ‘ νμ΅νλμ§ μ κ°μ¬ν μ μμκΉμ?