Why does my AI assistant recommend packages that turn out to be malware?
机会
When a code-generating model scaffolds a project, it invents package names at rates between 4.6% and 6.1% even on today's frontier models. Attackers register those hallucinated names as malicious packages before developers notice. Researchers studying five frontier models released between October 2025 and March 2026 found 127 package names all five models invent identically; 53 of them remain registrable by an attacker after each registry's existing defenses. No IDE plugin, no CI step, and no package manager checks whether a model-suggested package name was ever real before resolving it. The only current advice is to read every import manually, which no team does at scale.
为什么重要
Until there is a pre-install oracle that cross-references model-suggested names against real registry data, every AI-assisted build is one hallucinated import away from installing malware.
我如何评估机会
机会评分是我的个人判断，而非量化指标：痛苦程度、发生频率，以及当前解决方案的匮乏程度。分数越高，意味着我认为越值得去构建。
出现时造成的痛苦程度。
人们实际遇到它的频率。
当前针对它的优质工具有多匮乏。