Skip to content
Blockchain

Why does switching to a private mempool still leave me open to sandwich attacks?

82

Opportunity

Private and encrypted mempools now route more than half of Ethereum transactions, but encrypting a transaction does not hide everything a searcher needs. The trading pair, the direction of a swap, and a coarse size range can be inferred from surrounding chain state and timing metadata even when the transaction bytes are fully encrypted. A paper accepted at NeurIPS 2026 derives exact leakage thresholds at which this partial information remains sufficient to run a profitable sandwich attack against users who believe they are protected. The result is a false safety assumption: users opt into private relays and stop worrying, while searchers adapt their strategies to the residual signal that leaks through. There is no production tooling today that lets a user measure how much information their transaction leaks before they submit it, so the protection is unauditable.

Why it matters

Encryption is not privacy if the residual observable signal is enough to attack, and the first tool that quantifies per-transaction leakage turns privacy from a claim into a verifiable property.

How I score the opportunity

The Opportunity Score is my own read, not a measurement: how much it hurts, how often it bites, and how little exists to solve it today. Higher means I think it is more worth building.

Severity7/10

How much pain it causes when it shows up.

Frequency8/10

How often people actually run into it.

Whitespace9/10

How little good tooling exists for it today.

More problems worth solving