How do I know the code my AI assistant wrote is actually correct?
Opportunity
LLMs produce code that passes unit tests but satisfies no formal properties. A model can construct tests that pass by construction, not because the logic is right. Formal verification tools exist but require writing specifications in theorem-prover syntax, which almost no working developer does. Recent benchmarks show that frontier models achieve only 3.2 percent success on end-to-end verifiable code generation, meaning the gap between plausible-looking code and proven-correct code is nearly entirely open. Teams shipping AI-written code into production are making a bet on test coverage that the models themselves can game.
Why it matters
Automated correctness guarantees for AI-generated code are what turn coding assistants from speed tools into reliability tools.
How I score the opportunity
The Opportunity Score is my own read, not a measurement: how much it hurts, how often it bites, and how little exists to solve it today. Higher means I think it is more worth building.
How much pain it causes when it shows up.
How often people actually run into it.
How little good tooling exists for it today.
More problems worth solving
Why does every AI app forget me the moment I close the tab?
AIWhy is learning a new field still gated by knowing what to ask?
AIWhy can a non-expert not verify what an AI just told them?
AIWhy do we test models on benchmarks but ship them on vibes?
AIWhy do AI agents have no memory of their own mistakes?
AIWhy can't I audit what a model was actually trained on?