Skip to content
Blockchain

Why does switching to a private mempool still leave me open to sandwich attacks?

82

기회

Private and encrypted mempools now route more than half of Ethereum transactions, but encrypting a transaction does not hide everything a searcher needs. The trading pair, the direction of a swap, and a coarse size range can be inferred from surrounding chain state and timing metadata even when the transaction bytes are fully encrypted. A paper accepted at NeurIPS 2026 derives exact leakage thresholds at which this partial information remains sufficient to run a profitable sandwich attack against users who believe they are protected. The result is a false safety assumption: users opt into private relays and stop worrying, while searchers adapt their strategies to the residual signal that leaks through. There is no production tooling today that lets a user measure how much information their transaction leaks before they submit it, so the protection is unauditable.

μ™œ μ€‘μš”ν•œκ°€

Encryption is not privacy if the residual observable signal is enough to attack, and the first tool that quantifies per-transaction leakage turns privacy from a claim into a verifiable property.

기회 평가 방식

기회 μ μˆ˜λŠ” 츑정값이 μ•„λ‹Œ 제 주관적 ν‰κ°€μž…λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ λΆˆνŽΈν•œμ§€, μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ 자주 λ°œμƒν•˜λŠ”μ§€, ν˜„μž¬ 해결책이 μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ λΆ€μ‘±ν•œμ§€λ₯Ό λ°˜μ˜ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€. μ μˆ˜κ°€ λ†’μ„μˆ˜λ‘ λ§Œλ“€ κ°€μΉ˜κ°€ 더 λ†’λ‹€κ³  μƒκ°ν•©λ‹ˆλ‹€.

심각도7/10

λ°œμƒν–ˆμ„ λ•Œ μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ 큰 λΆˆνŽΈμ„ μ΄ˆλž˜ν•˜λŠ”μ§€.

λΉˆλ„8/10

μ‹€μ œλ‘œ μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ 자주 μ ‘ν•˜κ²Œ λ˜λŠ”μ§€.

곡백 μ˜μ—­9/10

ν˜„μž¬ 이λ₯Ό ν•΄κ²°ν•  λ§Œν•œ 도ꡬ가 μ–Όλ§ˆλ‚˜ λΆ€μ‘±ν•œμ§€.

ν•΄κ²°ν•  κ°€μΉ˜ μžˆλŠ” 더 λ§Žμ€ λ¬Έμ œλ“€