Why does rotating a compromised wallet erase my entire on-chain history?
κΈ°ν
When a private key is leaked or lost, the only safe move is to abandon the address, but every piece of on-chain reputation, governance votes, lending history, and attestations stays with the old key. Moving those records to a new address requires publishing the link publicly, which permanently deanonymizes both addresses. Existing ZK identity schemes handle fresh anonymity sets but not migration of accumulated history between pseudonyms. A 2025 arXiv survey of decentralized identity systems identified key recoverability as one of the two dominant unsolved properties across all major DID methods. No production primitive exists that lets a user prove continuity to a new address under zero-knowledge while keeping the link between old and new private.
μ μ€μνκ°
Without a safe migration primitive, key rotation is practically impossible for anyone with meaningful on-chain history, which means compromised keys stay active far longer than they should.
κΈ°ν νκ° λ°©μ
κΈ°ν μ μλ μΈ‘μ κ°μ΄ μλ μ μ£Όκ΄μ νκ°μ λλ€. μΌλ§λ λΆνΈνμ§, μΌλ§λ μμ£Ό λ°μνλμ§, νμ¬ ν΄κ²°μ± μ΄ μΌλ§λ λΆμ‘±νμ§λ₯Ό λ°μν©λλ€. μ μκ° λμμλ‘ λ§λ€ κ°μΉκ° λ λλ€κ³ μκ°ν©λλ€.
λ°μνμ λ μΌλ§λ ν° λΆνΈμ μ΄λνλμ§.
μ€μ λ‘ μΌλ§λ μμ£Ό μ νκ² λλμ§.
νμ¬ μ΄λ₯Ό ν΄κ²°ν λ§ν λκ΅¬κ° μΌλ§λ λΆμ‘±νμ§.
ν΄κ²°ν κ°μΉ μλ λ λ§μ λ¬Έμ λ€
μμ‘μ 곡κ°νμ§ μκ³ μ§κΈ λ₯λ ₯μ μ¦λͺ ν μ μλ μ΄μ λ 무μμΌκΉ?
Blockchainμ²΄μΈ κ° μκΈ μ΄λμ΄ μ΄κΈ° μΈν°λ·λ³΄λ€ μμ§λ λ 무μμ΄ μ΄μ λ 무μμΌκΉ?
Blockchainκ·μ μ€μκ° μμ§λ PDF ν μ₯κ³Ό κΈ°λμ μμ‘΄νλ μ΄μ λ 무μμΌκΉ?
Blockchainμ μ ν 컀μ€ν°λλ μ¬μ ν ν€λ₯Ό μμ΄λ²λ¦¬κ±°λ νμ¬λ₯Ό μ λ’°νλ κ² μ¬μ΄μ μ νμΈκ°?
Blockchainμ€λ¬Ό μμ°μ ν ν°ννλ λ° μ μμ§λ μ€κ°μΈμ΄ μ΄ λͺ μ©μ΄λ νμν κΉμ?
Blockchainμ€ν μ΄λΈμ½μΈμ μ μΈν°λ· μμ΄ κ²°μ ν μ μμκΉμ?